Jeff Sutherland works with trying to find exact frequencies for infections and they are usually much higher then the cafl list frequencies, since it's their true frequencies. Many of the freqs from the cafl list are experimental reported by people who have benefited from them. Also the upper number is far off from the lower number so the pathogen must have a very wide frequency range then. How come 3000 of all numbers is the right number to kill an infecion with as well as 20. The cafl list seems to me to be very experimental still (but could be a good start though) especially when you go over certain frequencies that helps for almost any malady and many frequencies are often just to simple, for example one pathogen can be killed with freq 125, 95, 73, 20, 727, 3000. Many "experts" says that the frequencies has to be exact and the power is not as important in trying to delete infections. It's not an exact Science yet it seems and people are basically still just experimenting on themselves and others. I especially used all parasite frequencies I could find and tried all the Ascaris freqs a lot as well as Hulda Clark s favourite frequency for Ascaris which I believe was 408. The EMEM which is most similar to what you have I used many different frequencies from the CAFL list etc with. I have been using EMEMs for a couple of months as well as zappers, magnetic pulsers, static gen, bob beck machine and sputnik.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |